Serrallonga, was a Catalan bandoler. He robbed from the rich and battled royalist forces.
Robbing Hood, was a men like Serrallonga, but he was from England.
They had got a lot of thinks in comun. They were national heroes. They stole rich people and gave the earings to the poor people.
2 comentarios:
In you assumption Robin Hood is portrayed as a heroic proto-socialist, deeply concerned with the suffering of the oppressed peasantry. He steals from the rich, gives to the poor and clearly hates the feudal system. He and his men will crush those aristocratic spongers and restore those starving serfs to their natural freedom.
However, if Robin Hood really lived, he fought for the usurped King Richard, against his brother, Prince John. Robin Hood defended not only the practice of monarchy, but the principle – he wanted a pious, godly monarch who would correct the imbalance of stability and authority created by John and his cronies. Robin Hood fought for the King.
Robin Hood was not a leveller, not an egalitarian and certainly not a republican.
Hi, Adrià.
Good job!!!
By the way, who is "radical royalist"?
Publicar un comentario